BACK SEAT DRIVING - AUGUST 2009
This article is from our archives and has not been updated and integrated with our "new" site yet... Even so, it's still awesome - so keep reading!
Published on Sun, Aug 2, 2009
By: The LACar Editorial Staff
Â
Infiniti offered no cars that qualified for CARS
NAKANO: BACK SEAT DRIVING
CASH FOR CLUNKERS WINNERS & LOSERS
The Car Allowance Rebate System (CARS),
otherwise known as the Cash for Clunkers program came to a screeching halt
August 25, 2009, with nearly 700,000 clunkers taken off the roads, replaced by
more fuel efficient vehicles. Rebate applications worth $2.877 billion were
submitted by the deadline, under the $3 billion provided by Congress to run the
program.
"American consumers and workers were the clear winners thanks to the cash for
clunkers program" said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. "Manufacturing
plants have added shifts and recalled workers. Moribund showrooms were brought
back to life and consumers bought fuel efficient cars that will save them money
and improve the environment."
"This is one of the best economic news stories we've seen and I'm proud we were
able to give consumers a helping hand" Secretary LaHood said.
"The federal government's attempt to stimulate the nation's economy by
instituting the CARS 2009 program remains the subject of debate even as it
concludes, but one thing is certain - it motivated hundreds of thousands of
consumers to buy new vehicles" said Jack R. Nerad, Executive Editorial Director
and Executive Market Analyst, Kelley Blue Book and kbb.com. "Whether it boosts
the overall economy for any length of time remains to be seen, but it does
demonstrate that a direct stimulus to consumers can quickly generate substantial
economic activity."
According to a preliminary analysis by the White House Council of Economic
Advisers, the CARS program will:
· Boost economic growth in the third quarter of 2009 by 0.3-0.4 percentage
points at an annual rate thanks to increased auto sales in July and August.
· Will sustain the increase in GDP in the fourth quarter because of increased
auto production to replace depleted inventories.
· Will create or save 42,000 jobs in the second half of 2009. Those jobs are
expected to remain well after the program's close.
Secretary LaHood asserts that the program was also good news for the
environment. "That's because 84 percent of consumers traded in trucks and 59
percent purchased passenger cars. The average fuel economy of the vehicles
traded in was 15.8 miles per gallon and the average fuel economy of vehicles
purchased is 24.9 mpg. - a 58 percent improvement. This is a win for the
economy, a win for the environment and a win for American consumers" Secretary
LaHood said.
Not exactly. There were some losers as well as winners from this program. Let's
take a closer look at who exactly won and lost in this program:
WINNER: LAWMAKERS
Congress has dished out a lot of money to stimulate this recessive economy. None
has had the immediate impact the way that the CARS program has. This may explain
why it received broad, bi-partisan support - particularly after the initial
funds ran out much sooner than expected.
WINNER & LOSER: THE ADMINISTRATION
The Obama administration pushed for this program and pulled out all the stops to
bring it to fruition. However, lack of clear guidelines at the onset and
midstream changes, such as what to do with the clunkers that are turned in, made
car dealers justifiably nervous.
WINNER: CAR DEALERS
Car dealers with access to qualifying cars and who knew the rules of the game
reaped the benefits of the program. These dealers were able to clean out their
inventories and, in some cases, were able to sell vehicles without the usual
manufacturer and dealer-initiated incentives.
LOSER: CAR DEALERS
Some dealers didn't do their homework well enough and made transactions that
didn't follow all of the requirements in the program. Usually, it meant taking a
trade-in that didn't qualify as a clunker (e.g., too old, EPA gas mileage too
good, etc.).
WINNER: TOYOTA
Of all the auto makers, Toyota was the biggest recipient of Cars for Clunkers,
selling more vehicles under the program than anyone else. And it wasn't the
Prius that sold the most (not enough supply); it was the Corolla that came out
on top.
LOSER: INFINITI
Despite the perception that Japanese automakers make cars with good gas mileage,
not a single new Infiniti product had sufficiently good gas mileage to qualify
for the program.
WINNER: GM & FORD
Among the domestic auto makers, General Motors sold the most vehicles under the program.
Among the top ten models sold, Ford had the most domestic models. Ford attributes the program to boosting both its sales and profits
for the month of July (and likely for the month of August). Ford was able to
clean out its inventory of Focuses and put a sizeable dent in its Escape
inventory.
LOSER: LOW INCOME FAMILIES
A lot of perfectly good-running vehicles were permanently taken off the road as
a result of this program. These are the cars that low income families can
afford. Nearly 700,000 of these vehicles are no longer available to them. For
many, it means turning to very old vehicles that didn't qualify for the program,
but that pollute even more and use more fuel.
LOSER & WINNER: THE ENVIRONMENT
"For environmentalists the effects of CARS 2009 are largely regarded as mixed"
says Kelley Blue Book Executive Editorial Director and Executive Maret Analyst
Jack R. Nerad. "Certainly the program did get a lot of older,
less-fuel-efficient vehicles off the nation's roads immediately never to return.
there are also some environmental questions about the efficacy of
destroying vehicles that retain usefulness and replacing them with newly built
vehicles. Some would say the environment wins in that situation; others would
say it does not."
In the end, the CARS program was more of a win-lose-win. "The effectiveness of
the 'cash-for-clunkers' program will be judged in a number of ways, but a key
measure will be how does the automotive market respond to the absence of the
'clunkers' incentive to buy now?" says Nerad. "One clear success of the program
was that it got a significant number of Americans thinking about buying a new
car again. Any dealer can tell you that increased traffic results in increased
sales, and the clunkermania definitely increased traffic."Â Â
  Â
Â
Â
Â
NAKANO: BACK SEAT DRIVING
NISSAN CLAIMS 367 MPG FOR ITS LEAF UNDER DOE STANDARDS
Everyone's getting into the act. As you know,
General Motors announced an estimated 230 mpg for the upcoming Volt
extended-range EV earlier this month. The claim was somewhat upended by EPA,
noting that it actually hasn't tested Chevrolet's new Volt. Not to be outdone,
Nissan responds (via Twitter) that its upcoming LEAF EV can do better:
"Nissan Leaf = 367 mpg, no tailpipe, and no gas required. Oh yeah, and it'll be
affordable too!"
Nissan is referring to the fact that the Chevrolet Volt is slated to sell in the
$40,000 range, while their new Leaf is expected to go for around $25,000.
As for Nissan's 367 MPG figure, the company followed with with another tweet,
indicating that they were using a Department of Energy formula to estimate the
367 MPG equivalency for the electric LEAF. Of course, the LEAF is fully
electric, and doesn't use any fossil fuel in which to calculate miles per
gallon, but Nissan makes it point. Â
  Â
Â
Â
Â
NAKANO: BACK SEAT DRIVING
The
Chevrolet Volt extended-range electric vehicle is expected to achieve city fuel
economy of at least 230 miles per gallon, based on General Motors data
development testing using a draft Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) federal
fuel economy methodology for labeling for plug-in electric vehicles.
The Volt, which is scheduled to start production in late 2010 as a 2011 model,
is expected to travel up to 40 miles on electricity from a single battery charge
and be able to extend its overall range to more than 300 miles with its flex
fuel-powered engine-generator.
"From the data we've seen, many Chevy Volt drivers may be able to be in pure
electric mode on a daily basis without having to use any gas," said GM Chief
Executive Officer Fritz Henderson. "EPA labels are a yardstick for customers to
compare the fuel efficiency of vehicles. So, a vehicle like the Volt that
achieves a composite triple-digit fuel economy is a game-changer."
"The key to high-mileage performance is for a Volt driver to plug into the
electric grid at least once each day," Henderson said.
Volt drivers' actual gas-free mileage will vary depending on how far they travel
and other factors, such as how much cargo or how many passengers they carry and
how much the air conditioner or other accessories are used. Based on the results
of unofficial development testing of pre-production prototypes, the Volt has
achieved 40 miles of electric-only, petroleum-free driving in both EPA city and
highway test cycles.
Under the new methodology being developed, EPA weights plug-in electric vehicles
as traveling more city miles than highway miles on only electricity. The EPA
methodology uses kilowatt hours per 100 miles traveled to define the electrical
efficiency of plug-ins. Applying EPA's methodology, GM expects the Volt to
consume as little as 25 kilowatt hours per 100 miles in city driving. At the
U.S. average cost of electricity (approximately 11 cents per kWh), a typical
Volt driver would pay about $2.75 for electricity to travel 100 miles, or less
than 3 cents per mile.
The Chevrolet Volt uses grid electricity as its primary source of energy to
propel the car. There are two modes of operation: Electric and Extended-Range.
In electric mode, the Volt will not use gasoline or produce tailpipe emissions
when driving. During this primary mode of operation, the Volt is powered by
electrical energy stored in its 16 kWh lithium-ion battery pack.
When the battery reaches a minimum state of charge, the Volt automatically
switches to Extended-Range mode. In this secondary mode of operation, an
engine-generator produces electricity to power the vehicle. The energy stored in
the battery supplements the engine-generator when additional power is needed
during heavy accelerations or on steep inclines.
"The 230 city mpg number is a great indication of the capabilities of the Volt's
electric propulsion system and its ability to displace gasoline," said Frank
Weber, global vehicle line executive for the Volt. "Actual testing with
production vehicles will occur next year closer to vehicle launch. However, we
are very encouraged by this development, and we also think that it is important
to continue to share our findings in real time, as we have with other aspects of
the Volt's development."
In response to a query from Green Car Advisor, howver, the EPA issued the
following statement:
" The EPA has not tested a Chevy Volt and therefore cannot confirm the fuel
economy values claimed by GM. EPA does applaud GM's commitment to designing and
building the car of the future - an American-made car that will save families
money, significantly reduce our dependence on foreign oil and create good-paying
American jobs. We're proud to see American companies and American workers
leading the world in the clean energy innovations that will shape the 21st
century economy."
Â
Â
Â
NAKANO: BACK SEAT DRIVINGTURNING
OVER A NEW LEAF
Nissan Unveils Affordable Electric Car for the Masses
On August 2nd, Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. unveiled the Nissan LEAF, an affordable,
zero-emission car. Designed specifically for a lithium-ion battery-powered
chassis, Nissan LEAF is a medium-size hatchback that comfortably seats five
adults and has a range of more than 160km (100 miles) to satisfy real-world
consumer requirements.
Slated for launch in late 2010 in Japan, the United States, and Europe, Nissan
sees the LEAF ushering in a new era of mobility - the zero-emission era.Â
"Nissan LEAF is a tremendous accomplishment - one in which all Nissan employees
can take great pride" said Nissan President and CEO Carlos Ghosn. "We have been
working tirelessly to make this day a reality - the unveiling of a real-world
car that has zero - not simply reduced - emissions. It's the first step in what
is sure to be an exciting journey - for people all over the world, for Nissan
and for the industry."
The automaker points to five key characteristics of the new LEAF:
Zero-emission power train and platform
Affordable pricing
Distinctive design
Real-world range autonomy - 160km (100 miles)
Connected Mobility: Advanced intelligent transportation (IT) system
Pricing details will be announced closer to start of sales in late 2010;
however, the company expects the car to be competitively priced in the range of
a well-equipped C-segment vehicle. Additionally, Nissan LEAF is expected to
qualify for an array of significant local, regional and national tax breaks and
incentives in markets around the world. Nissan claims that because the vehicle
has less mechanical complexity than a traditional gasoline-powered car, the LEAF
should be friendly to the wallet as well as to the environment.
Zero-Emission Mobility
Nissan LEAF is powered by laminated compact lithium-ion batteries, which
generate power output of over 90kW, while its electric motor delivers
80kW/280Nm. Nissan hopes this ensures a responsive experience that is in keeping
with what consumers have come to expect from traditional, gasoline-powered
automobiles.
Unlike internal-combustion engine (ICE) equipped vehicles, Nissan LEAF's power
train has no tail pipe, and thus no emission of CO2 or other greenhouse gases. A
combination of Nissan LEAF's regenerative braking system and innovative
lithium-ion battery packs enables the car to deliver a driving range of more
than 160km (100 miles) on one full charge*. (*US LA4 mode)
Nissan claims that extensive consumer research demonstrates that this range
satisfies the daily driving requirements of more than 70 percent of the world's
consumers who drive cars.
The LEAF can be charged up to 80 percent of its full capacity in just under 30
minutes with a quick charger, according to Nissan. Charging at home through a
200V outlet is estimated to take approximately eight hours.
Real-World Car?
"Our car had to be the world's first, medium-size, practical EV that motorists
could afford and would want to use every day. And that's what we've created. The
styling will identify not only Nissan LEAF but also the owner as a participant
in the new era of zero-emission mobility" said Masato INOUE, Product Chief
Designer.
Nissan LEAF's frontal styling is characterized by a sharp, upright V-shaped
design featuring long, up-slanting light-emitting diode (LED) headlights that
employ a blue internal reflective design that is meant to remind everyone around
that this is a special car. The headlights are also designed to split and
redirect airflow away from the door mirrors, thus reducing wind noise and drag.
And, the headlights consume just 10 percent of the electricity of conventional
lamps, according to Nissan.
Through bright trim colors inside, Nissan LEAF creates a pleasing and stylish
cabin environment. An environmentally friendly "blue earth" color theme
originates from the Aqua Globe body color of Nissan LEAF's introductory model.
This theme is carried into the interior through blue dashboard highlights and
instrument illumination.
For some consumers, Nissan LEAF will be the perfect match, and the only car they
will ever need. For others, Nissan LEAF will be a logical addition to the family
fleet - the optimal choice for the daily commute, for example.
Nissan LEAF is the first in the company's forthcoming line of EVs and is a major
milestone in the realization of the Renault-Nissan Alliance's vision for
zero-emission mobility. The first of Nissan's EV's will be manufactured at
Oppama, Japan, with additional capacity planned for Smyrna, Tennessee, USA.
Meanwhile, lithium-ion batteries are being produced in Zama, Japan, with
additional capacity planned for the USA, the UK and Portugal, and other sites
for investment are under study around the world.
Connected Mobility IT System
Nissan says its LEAF employs an exclusive advanced IT system. Connected to a
global data center, the system can provide support, information, and
entertainment for drivers 24 hours a day.
The dash-mounted monitor displays Nissan LEAF's remaining power - or "reachable
area" - in addition to showing a selection of nearby charging stations.
Another feature is the ability to use mobile phones to turn on air-conditioning
and set charging functions - even when Nissan LEAF is powered down. An on-board
remote-controlled timer can also be pre-programmed to recharge batteries.
"The IT system is a critical advantage" says Tooru ABE, Chief Product
Specialist. "We wanted this vehicle to be a partner for the driver and an
enhancement for the passengers. We also wanted this vehicle to help create a
zero-emission community, and these IT features will help make that possible."
For more information, go to
www.nissan-zeroemission.com Â
  Â
Â
Â
Â
A
JOURNAL OF LOS ANGELES & ITS CAR CULTURE That
was LA Car's subtitle when it started back in 1997. It's original website
address was about five times the size of lacar.com. Since then, La Car
became LA Car. Its subtitle became
Reporting From Car Culture Ground Zero, then From The Heart of Car
Culture, to today's The Cars and Culture of Southern California. At
all times, however, we aimed to chronicle the Southland's automotive spirit - much like
one's own
journal or diary.
LA Car has always been a great source
to come back to from week-to-week, to see what articles and reviews have been
added to our rather staggering database. With Back Seat Driving, a.k.a.
BSD (note the similarity to two well-worn abbreviations, BS and BFD) and Hot
Wires - Hot & Tender News From the Car Culture (co-located with Back Seat
Driving, and updated at least daily), we give you some reasons to
come back more often (all opinions, by the way, are those of the respective
author).
So, go
ahead and bookmark www.lacar.com. We'll be
sure to always provide a link to Hot Wires and the latest Back Seat
Driving blog entry. In the meantime, welcome to the journal and journey from
the heart of the car culture. - Roy NakanoÂ
For
past Blog entries, click the following:
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004